Non-monogamy and bisexuality have often been conceptualized separately within the context of sexuality and relationships. However, as Mimi Schippers (2016) argues in her article “Openness, Nonmonogamy, and Bisexualities: A Critical Review”, the intersection of these two aspects of identity is significant and worthy of exploration. In this essay, I will provide an overview of Schippers’ article, highlighting the key themes and arguments presented.
The Intersection of Nonmonogamy and Bisexuality: Schippers begins by situating the discussion of nonmonogamy and bisexuality within broader cultural discourses around sexual orientation and relationship norms. She notes that monogamy is often seen as the “gold standard” for relationships, while bisexuality is still stigmatized and misunderstood. This can lead to a marginalization of those who identify as both non-monogamous and bisexual.
Schippers argues that understanding the intersection of nonmonogamy and bisexuality is important because these two aspects of identity are often connected. Non-monogamous relationships can provide an opportunity for bisexual individuals to explore and express their sexuality in a way that is not possible within the confines of monogamy. Additionally, bisexuality can challenge the assumption that sexual attraction is inherently limited to one gender or one partner, which is a key tenet of monogamous relationships.
Challenges and Benefits of Nonmonogamy and Bisexuality: Schippers also explores the challenges and benefits of nonmonogamy and bisexuality within the context of intimate relationships. One of the key challenges she identifies is the potential for discrimination and stigma from both within and outside of the LGBTQ+ community. Bisexual individuals in non-monogamous relationships may face stigma from those who view bisexuality as inherently promiscuous or unstable, while non-monogamous individuals may face stigma from those who view non-monogamy as unethical or deviant.
However, Schippers also notes that there are benefits to exploring non-monogamy and bisexuality within relationships. For example, non-monogamous relationships can provide greater opportunities for emotional and sexual exploration and can challenge the assumption that one partner can meet all of an individual’s needs. Additionally, exploring bisexuality within the context of non-monogamy can challenge the idea that sexual orientation is fixed and can provide opportunities for personal growth and discovery.
Schippers also emphasizes the importance of communication and negotiation skills in non-monogamous relationships. Because non-monogamous relationships often involve multiple partners and/or fluid sexual identities, clear communication and negotiation are crucial for ensuring that all parties are aware of and comfortable with the dynamics of the relationship.
Overall, Schippers’ article provides a critical review of the intersection of non-monogamy and bisexuality and the potential benefits and challenges of exploring these identities within intimate relationships. She highlights the importance of understanding and supporting those who identify as both non-monogamous and bisexual, as well as the need for continued research and discussion around these topics.
Reference:
Author: M. Schippers
Year of publication: 2016
Title: Openness, Nonmonogamy, and Bisexualities: A Critical Review
Journal: Journal of Bisexuality
Volume: 16
Issue: 3
Page range: 305-325
DOI: 10.1080/15299716.2016.1196707